Tilt To Live Give Peace A Chance Harder
Billy gives a bit of a curious head tilt, thinking he hears something kind of familiar and childlike, but no one's come in with anything like a child before. Hey, I'm Billy. Um, we don't really have like.traditional jobs around here. It's more sort of a cooperative kind of thing. But most people have found a place to sleep in the hotel. Nov 20, 2007 50+ videos Play all Mix - John Lennon - Give peace a chance (live) YouTube John Lennon 'Give Peace a Chance' Live in Toronto 1969 - Duration: 3:15. Drzoom 230,612 views.
Welcome!Questions and discussions about, for, to, or from the Reddit transgender community.Open to anyone with a question.:(Hover to expand) RuleDetails1. Your post should encourage discussion and be inclusive.We prefer that titles be in the form of a question, but if this is not possible, please make sure either the post title or content provides a starting point for discussion. Use inclusive language e.g. Not 'How did you ladies choose a female name?' But instead 'How did you find your new name?'
Be respectful, especially about how people identify themselves.No bigotry (transphobia, homophobia, sexism, racism, etc); no hateful speech or disrespectful commentary; no personal attacks; no; no; no; no shaming based on stealth, open or closeted status.3. No personal agendas.is a place for discussion and is not a soapbox. If a post or comment indicates a personal agenda, or if it's clear they have not come here with an open mind, their post(s) will be removed.4. No stirring the pot.Please do not post threads that intentionally create drama, target a different sub or link to threads in a different sub, or otherwise encourage brigading.5. Minors under the age of 13 are not allowed on reddit. We are required to report members identifying as such to the reddit admins.'
Maybe your favorite flash games are Shooting Games. Whatever kind of game you feel like playing you can find it on FlashArcade.com.If you like arcade games like the popular Dinner Dash game or tower defense games like Azgard Tower Defense and Front Line Tower Defence you can find them on FlashArcade.com. You can play free games on FlashArcade.com any time!
Although we welcome users from all walks of life, reddit is not aimed at children, and the United States government has put limits on our ability to accept users under a certain age through the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998. Individuals under the age of 13 may not create an account with us. If you believe someone 12 or younger is using our site without parental consent, please contact us.' For approval before posting a questionnaire, survey, promotion, or advertisement.We'd like to review it before it is posted.7. Posts with NSFW content must be marked.Posts that center around genitals, breasts, sex, or content you would not discuss with coworkers, your grandmother, or other delicate company should be marked as NSFW.8. No fetishizing or chasersWe will remove any posts treating trans bodies as fetishes or objects, and any posts that indicate your attraction is more important than your partner's dysphoria.Medical DisclaimerThe members of this subreddit do not act as medical professionals. We only provide general information about medical transition, which may be misleading for your individual circumstances.
This information is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice. Always seek the advice of your qualified health care provider regarding any medical questions. Useful Links.
What this actually is (to expand on what Sayoneko said) is estrogen induced movement. Estrogen causes certain behavioural changes which include alternate motor program recruitment. The effect is that estrogen causes the motor cortex to activate the spinal erectors causing lumbar flexion and anterior pelvic tilt aka: the mating position. This may give the appearance of a bigger booty but in fact only leads to horrible back pain. In order to build a booty you need to focus on actually increasing the muscle size of the varies gluteal and hamstring muscles with specifically targeted areas at an intensity and volume high enough to cause hypertrophy. In order to achieve this proper limbo-pelvic control is also needed. Estrogen may increase flexibility but flexibility without motor control is dangerous.Although some people are just genetically lucky and have bigger muscles/better fat distribution etc and look great with hardly any work but it won't be the case for most people.Lordosis behaviour is well studied in rats not humans.
:Lordosis behavior—also known as mammalian lordosis (Greek lordōsis, from lordos 'bent backward' ) or presenting—is a body posture, hardwired in the brain, adopted mainly by non mammals including, and others, usually associated with females and their receptivity to. The primary characteristics are a lowering of the forelimbs whilst keeping the rear limbs extended and raised, arching of the and a raising, or sideward, displacement of the.
During lordosis, the spine curves so that the apex points towards the abdomen. The term ' is sometimes used to describe, in humans, abnormal forward curvature of the spine in the region.Interesting: Parent commenter can. Will also delete on comment score of -1 or less.
The suggestion by Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas that a NATO force might be indefinitely stationed in a Palestinian state in the West Bank to meet Israeli security concerns sounds at first glance like a can of worms that the United States and its allies would best avoid, and perhaps it is. It would seem to put Western soldiers in the middle of a conflict so long and so bitter that—even with a peace settlement, of which such a deployment would be one of the terms—some distrust and doubt would linger and some extremist wild cards would still be in play. But the idea should not be peremptorily discarded. Maybe the North Atlantic Council should discuss it.
Consider first of all the basic reasonableness of what Abbas was saying. He explicitly recognized that Israel has legitimate security concerns about what would be going on in a Palestinian state on the West Bank, concerns that some sort of security force would have to assuage. He also disavowed creation of a Palestinian army, for that or any other purpose. But for Israel's military to stick around in the territories would be indistinguishable from continued occupation, an end to which is a central part of what the peace negotiations are supposed to be about. That leaves the alternative of a third party force.
Consider also precedents, especially that of the peace observation force in the Sinai known as the Multinational Force and Observers (MFO), which was created pursuant to the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty. The MFO is not a NATO mission, but the United States and several other members of NATO participate in it. (More attention should be given to the Egyptian-Israeli peace as a precedent in other respects as well, including demonstrating what trading land for peace really means and avoiding extraneous negotiation-inhibiting demands such as insisting that one side characterize the other in terms of a particular ethnic or religious group.)
It's not as if a NATO force in the West Bank would be likely to get in some big fight in the course of performing the mission of helping to keep Israel safe from foreign threats. Much of what the current Israeli government has been saying about such threats is fundamentally phony, especially as it relates to a supposed need to maintain defenses in the Jordan River valley. No NATO force would have to repel an invasion force coming across the river.
Individual acts of terrorism are a different matter, of course. But it cannot be said often enough that a peace agreement that ends the occupation would drastically change the bidding and change the motivation and likelihood of attacks on Israel of any sort.
There would remain the possibility of a terrorist act by a rejectionist fringe, and the stickiest situation in which a NATO force might find itself would come in the wake of such an attack. Israel might then chomp at the bit to do what it has done several times on different azimuths in the past, which is to send its forces across a border and wreak some destruction, with its only hesitation this time being that some NATO troops would be in the way. If that caused Israeli decision-makers to think twice before launching yet another attack, that would be a good thing. It would be hard for anyone to make a case that Israel's previous similar attacks, when all their secondary effects are taken into account, have reduced terrorism. It would be easier to make a case that such attacks have strengthened the roots and motivations of further terrorism. It is an ironclad case that such attacks have increased the total number of innocent people killed.
Meanwhile, some positive reaction to Abbas's suggestion, as a supplement or modification to whatever was in General Allen's security plan, might have some modest additional benefits. One would be in effect to call the bluff of the Netanyahu government regarding whether some of what it terms a security need is really just a desire to cling to land. That government is unlikely to change any of its positions in response, but perhaps a few more Israelis would be stimulated to think hard about whether endless conflict and reliance on repeated use of their own military resources is how they really want to live.
Such a gesture might also lend one small bit of balance to the U.S. tilt toward the Israeli negotiating position and thus reduce the chance that the Palestinians will feel they have no choice but to abandon the peace talks. The gesture, moreover, would be one taken in the name of Israeli security.
Finally, if the proposal ever were implemented it might give the old Cold War alliance something useful to do. It would probably be better than endlessly waging a war in Afghanistan.